Skip to main content
Bisa Baik Bersama Bisa Baik Bersama
Indonesian field team reviewing maps and program plans inside a community hall.

A framework that treats exit as a phase, not an event.

Every engagement moves through three reinforcing phases. Implementation, exit and sustainability are planned together, because in practice they never separate cleanly.

Co-design, co-create, co-sustain.

  1. I

    Phase I

    Community circle dialogue grounding the co-design phase in local realities.

    Co-design for delivery and exit

    Designing programs that are implementable, accountable and exit-aware.

    • Alignment on program objectives and exit expectations
    • Implementation planning and exit pathway design
    • Social, operational and institutional risk mapping
    • Identification of local capacities and long-term roles
  2. II

    Phase II

    Community participants and field staff working together during a program session.

    Co-create through accountable delivery

    Delivering with monitoring, learning and operational discipline.

    • Adaptive program execution with clear milestones
    • Monitoring, accountability and adaptive learning
    • Preparation of local systems, leadership and governance
    • Risk-aware adjustments grounded in field realities
  3. III

    Phase III

    Training session preparing local actors to take ownership at exit.

    Co-sustain with responsible exit

    Extending impact through systems, markets and partnerships.

    • Exit readiness assessment using the Exit Forward Model
    • Transfer of roles and ownership to local actors
    • Integration into market mechanisms and livelihoods
    • Limited post-exit check-ins and learning capture
Training and risk review session with the field team and community representatives.

Discipline that stays responsive to what the field is doing.

Development programs are complex, and exit is where that complexity shows up most. A risk-aware approach is what keeps a program relevant and accountable through delivery and transition.

Social and contextual
Community dynamics, power relations and local acceptance.
Operational and implementation
Partner capacity, field coordination and execution consistency.
Sustainability and exit
Institutional readiness, local ownership and post-program dependency.
Reputational and accountability
Compliance, transparency and clarity of roles.

How we manage it

  • Early risk identification during design and initial execution
  • Continuous monitoring and adaptive adjustment
  • Learning folded back into delivery and exit decisions
  • Accountable documentation and reporting

Three principles that reinforce each other.

Community-centered

Starting from the needs, values and real dynamics of the community. The community is a subject of change, not its object.

Data-driven

Decisions driven by baseline studies, continuous monitoring, in-depth evaluation and systematic reflection.

Risk-aware

Every stage managed inside a social and operational risk management framework, not an informal judgement call.